Amid heroin deaths, authorities debate drug that stops overdose
At least we're not alone. The fentanyl OD deaths have hit Boston. They're considering distributing naloxone, but not a word about treatment.
News and recovery-oriented commentary about current controversies, emerging trends and research findings related to drug and alcohol addiction, treatment and recovery.
At least we're not alone. The fentanyl OD deaths have hit Boston. They're considering distributing naloxone, but not a word about treatment.
U.S. smoking continues to decline. However, over 85% of our clients smoke, and research consistently demonstrates that it negatively impacts their recovery.
The Northeast Addiction Technology Transfer Center just released two new recovery management monographs. The first is about linking treatment to communities and the second is on building resilience.
Here's a summary of a study examining responses to overdoses:
A study of IV drug users in Baltimore found that more than two-thirds had witnessed an overdose. But only two-thirds of those called 911 for emergency medical help, and even then, they delayed making the call by five minutes or more.
Often, witnesses to an overdose tried their own remedies, such as walking the victim around, shaking them or inflicting pain, and one in four injected a home-made solution of salt water in an attempt to reverse the overdose, said Robin Pollini, Ph.D., lead author of the study, which appears in the September issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Most witnesses did not call 911 promptly because they thought the victim could be revived without help, but many reported fearing involvement by the police
A new study finds that mentally ill alcoholics and religious skeptics benefit equally from 12-Step Programs.
This article provides a good overview of smoking cessation interventions. It's got a handy table that provides information on the evidence base and quit rates for various interventions.
An article I linked to in my last post referred to Neil McKeganey as a critic of methadone. I wasn't sure that was a fair characterization, but this editorial makes it clear that he is a critic. While he's sometimes dismissed as a critic, I haven't seen criticism of the methodology of his studies. This editorial is worth a read. Here's an excerpt:Methadone will undoubtedly continue to play a role in our drug-treatment services, but not as a drug provided for ever-increasing numbers of users for ever-lengthening periods, with little or no expectation of their eventual recovery.There is in the world of drug-abuse treatment a division between public knowledge and private knowledge, exemplified in the following conversation. I was speaking recently with one of the UK's top medical advisers on drug addiction. We were discussing methadone when he said that if his daughter had a heroin problem, he would do all he could to get her into a residential programme.
"When I am prescribing methadone in my day-to-day work," he said, "I know in my heart of hearts it is not a solution to the individual's drug problem but the only option I have for the majority of addicts I am seeing".
There is a simple truth here but one that is rarely shared, namely that methadone has all too easily become the drug-addiction treatment for the masses. There are no superstar heroin addicts or drug-dependent doctors signing themselves up for long-term methadone programmes. Residential rehabilitation is the gold-standard treatment for those who can afford it or those who are lucky enough to get it on the state.
Our masses, however, need more than the cheapest treatment if they are to live a life that is not dictated by the rhythms of their drug addiction. What they need are fewer drugs and greater support in their attempts at remaining drug free. And that is no quick fix.
While we're talking about a relatively small number of people, I've definitely been hearing more clients report injecting crack cocaine in intake interviews over the last year.
This article does a decent job of presenting one addict's experience with methadone and a couple professional's opinions on it. Unfortunately the discussion is limited to opinions. One statement that leaped out at me is this:"I hear that from a lot of health-care professionals too, who don't have a lot of faith in it, you know, because (addicts) want that methadone. But, you know, they're not sticking something in their arm. There's so much hepatitis and HIV out there and it's dangerous. So, maybe it is another drug. The harm-reduction drug works very effectively for the majority of people," she says.Opposition to it is based on addicts wanting it? That's a pretty reductionist characterization of those who don't have faith in it. It's also based on an assumption that could well be false. A U.K. study found that 60% of methadone clients would prefer to be in abstinence focused treatment.
A story about the impact of treatment on a drug ravaged community. It's pretty vague about the treatment provided. I suspect it's methadone but could be naltrexone or buprenorphine.
I saw this press release and wanted to take this opportunity to give you a heads up about press releases like this and the occasional news stories based on them.
More good news about a simple, cost effective way to help people stop smoking:
Authors' conclusions:Proactive telephone counselling helps smokers interested in quitting. There is evidence of a dose response; one or two brief calls are less likely to provide a measurable benefit. Three or more calls increases the odds of quitting compared to a minimal intervention such as providing standard self-help materials, brief advice, or compared to pharmacotherapy alone. Telephone quitlines provide an important route of access to support for smokers, and call-back counselling enhances their usefulness.
SAMHSA just released a report on homeless admissions to treatment in 2004. No surprises.
A story from Columbus, Ohio on the the coming shortage of addiction counselors.
Here's an NPR story the program that houses drinking alcoholics in Seattle. The story makes it clear that they've given up hope that these people can get better. I'm all for housing them, but put some expectations on the client (participation in some form of treatment and/or mutual aid groups) and keep working to facilitate recovery.
This study finds marked differences in outcomes between doctors with training in alcoholism versus those without. The average amount of training among the group of trained doctors was only 10 hours.
Trained GPs proved better i) in the attempt at abstinence, with 67% patients becoming sober vs. 47% in a comparison sample and ii) in repeat attempt at abstinence in the event of relapse, with an average 2.99 vs. 1.31 attempts per patient.
Public Citizen is asking the FDA to prevent the promotion of laser therapy as a smoking cessation treatment. More here.
Here's a summary of a recent study on the impact of seeking help on the likelihood of abstinence. People who sought help had more severe and more numerous problems, but they were significantly more likely to recover than people who did not seek help. I went to the article and founce no mention of whether the person sought help because of external pressures (like courts).
Even though they had more comorbidity and therefore were at risk for worse outcomes, seekers of formal and informal treatment had better odds of recovery from alcohol dependence.
NPR's Morning Edition is running a series on chronic homelessness. Today's segment talked about the importance of supportive housing and addressing "root causes of homelessness" like mental illness and addiction. This was a controversial assertion in Ann Arbor 10 years ago, it is less controversial now. A representative from the Rockefeller Foundation talked about what a mistake it is to provide housing without also addressing these root causes.
The British National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (NTA) recently released a research report about addiction careers and natural change. Looking at addiction careers is a pretty new area of research and represents a shift toward looking at addiction as a chronic condition. When one starts to look at addiction this way, one possible outcome of treatment is a reduction in addiction careers.
Quit smoking to stick it to the man!:
The direct correlation between lower socioeconomic status and mortality risk is well known, but a new study by the University of Toronto and the University of Oxford is the first to determine that more than half the difference in risk of death between men in the highest social strata and those in the lowest can be attributed to smoking.
A reader makes a fair criticism:
Just a comment that from a prevention advocate's point of view (the ones who are creating the "firestorm",) the potential innate harm of a drug is not limited to or defined by whether or not someone becomes addicted to it. E.g. It's well documented that cannabis impairs driving skills, esp the ability to stay in a lateral lane. If my son smoked dope and was killed or injured in a car accident, or was hit by someone who had been smoking dope, all I would care about is that my son was injured or killed; I wouldn't much care whether or not the use resulted from a chemically dependent limbic system or a poor choice. [Some friends] once did a workshop for parents on marijuana, and several legalization advocates showed up to argue and it was turning into a circus until a local student who was attending as part of a class assignment stood up and said she had a 2 year old son she had not planned to have and she ever would have slept with the father if she hadn't been high on marijuana. Those are the kinds of consequences that are hard to measure and do not result only from addiction, they result from use.My point (poorly made), was not that addiction is the only harm or only important harm that might result from marijuana use. Rather, that both sides seize upon these kinds of findings and stretch the truth to make their case.
A recent marijuana study concluded that there was no link between smoking marijuana and lung cancer. This set off a firestorm - cannabis advocates argued that it's safe; anti-drug activists argued that it's still dangerous. One of the recent studies that they seized upon concluded that marijuana use in rats was linked to heroin use. This brought retorts criticizing these activists of reviving the "gateway theory". Now there's a new study linking marijuana smoking to pre-cancerous cells in smokers' lungs.
There have been several recent articles about supervised injection centers. Here's a recent one praising an Australian center and another from today asking hard questions about the same center.
The State of Kentucky has broken ground on a women's recovery center. This is part of Governor Fletcher's "Recovery Kentucky" initiative. (Here's an NPR story on it.) He plans to open 10 regional recovery centers that provide sheltering, transitional housing and recovery support for up to 2 years.
Colorado University-Boulder creates the Center for Students in Recovery. College recovery support programs are beginning to pop up around the country. Texas Tech was the pioneer.
Since the inception of the program, only one student out of 600 who have received scholarship aid has flunked out. Even more impressive is the fact that these recovering students maintain a grade point average of 3.58, well above the university-wide average of 2.85, and 95 percent of the participants have stayed clean and sober.
A study published in the August 2006 issue of the journal Addiction attempted to study the impact of treatment program relationships on treatment outcomes. No suprise, it found that treatment relationships based on acceptance and constructive social relationships resulted in better outcomes. Here are the highlights from the abstract. Let me know if you want a copy of the entire article:
Aims This study presented and tested a model of behavior change in long-term substance use disorder recovery, the acceptance and relationship context (ARC) model. The model specifies that acceptance-based behavior and constructive social relationships lead to recovery, and that treatment programs with supportive, involved relationships facilitate the development of these factors.Conclusions Patients from treatment programs with an affiliative relationship network are more likely to respond adaptively to internal states associated previously with substance use, develop constructive social relationships and achieve long-term treatment benefits.
On July 3rd I posted an entry about a study using Hythiam's PROMETA protocol for methamphetamine addiction. I told you about their sketchy sales tactics and to expect to hear more about them. Well, this morning's Join Together email included the announcement below stating that they withdrew their summary of the study from their site.
EDITOR'S NOTE
The June 30 research summary Anti-Anxiety Drug Said to Help Meth Addicts, which appeared in the July 3 edition of JT Direct, has been withdrawn from our service. It reports preliminary uncontrolled results from off label use of a medication approved for a condition that is not addiction. The FDA has not approved this treatment modality, nor has it been supported by peer reviewed NIH research.
Project Prevention just announced its "2006 In '06" campaign. Project Prevention was formerly known as CRACK (Children Requiring A Caring Kommunity). Their goal for 2006 is to pay 2006 addicts to get sterilized or get some form of long term birth control. According to their website, they have a chapter in Detroit.
We don’t allow dogs to breed. We spay them. We neuter them. We try to keep them from having unwanted puppies, and yet these women are literally having litters of children …She's also quoted as saying the following:
My mind has changed as far as the women go. When I first started the program I was just so angry with these women. I thought they were scum. But during these years I've had the opportunity to meet many of these women, and eventually realized that my anger is more toward society. If the government had common sense, they would spend more money on drug treatment—then they'd be spending less on caring for these babies. People tell me I should be spending my money on treatment programs and I tell them for every [addicted child] I can prevent from being conceived, there's four million dollars that can be used for drug treatment.I'm all for preventing drug affected pregnancies. However, we know that the biggest barriers to a meaningful community response are stigma and hopelessness. It seems clear to me that this group's reductionist message - that addicted women are irresponsible, unloving baby machines - only makes the problem worse.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration overhauled their website. It was badly needed. Hopefully their wealth of materials will be easier to sort through.
Here is another perspective on the story about the impact of age of first use from a few days ago. The writer argues that the early drinking and future alcohol dependence is caused by environmental factors and hereditary predisposition rather than early drinking cause future alcohol problems.
A new drug from Pfizer shows promising results. The results don't include comparison to nicotine replacement therapy. The results seem to underscore that whatever your method, there's hope for quitting smoking.
The study lasted one year. Here are some facts from that study:
-- 44% of those on Chantix were not smoking at 12 weeks
-- 29.5%% of those on Zyban were not smoking at 12 weeks
-- 18% of those on a placebo were not smoking at 12 weeks
-- 22% of those on Chantix did not smoke from week 9 to 52
-- 16% of those on Zyban did not smoke from week 9 to 52
-- 8.4% of those on a placebo did not smoke from week 9 to 52
Another study, from the Unversity of Wisconsin included 1,027 volunteers, all of them smokers who wanted to quit. Results were almost the same as the ones above.
The third study involved people in seven countries - 1,900 smokers who wanted to quit. All of them took Chantix for the first 12 weeks, after which 1,236 (65%) were still not smoking. The 1,236 quitters were then divided into two groups: One group continued taking Chantix while the other took a placebo. This continued for another 12 weeks. At the end of the 24-week period:
-- 70.5% of those on Chantix were not smoking
-- 49.6% of those on a placebo were not smoking
This compelling Op-Ed calls for reforming the cocaine sentencing disparity created by the Anti Drug Abuse Act:
Defendants convicted with just 5 grams of crack cocaine, the weight of 5 sugar packets, were subject to a five-year mandatory minimum sentence. The same penalty was triggered for powder cocaine only when an offense involved at least 500 grams.
Twenty years later, the aftermath of these laws is sobering. More than 80 percent of the defendants prosecuted for a crack offense are African-American, despite the fact that more than two-thirds of crack users are white or Hispanic. By and large, these defendants are not the kingpins of the drug trade. Data from the US Sentencing Commission document that 73 percent of crack defendants had only low-level involvement in drug activity, such as street-level dealers, couriers, or lookouts. The commission also has found that crack cocaine sentences are the single most significant factor contributing to racial disparity in federal sentencing.
A new study (NY Times registration is free. If you don't want to register, go to www.bugmenot.com.) affirms what we've learned over the last 10 to 15 years about the importance of postponing age of first use:
47 percent of those who begin drinking alcohol before the age of 14 become alcohol dependent at some time in their lives, compared with 9 percent of those who wait at least until age 21. The correlation holds even when genetic risks for alcoholism are taken into account.
"We definitely didn't know 5 or 10 years ago that alcohol affected the teen brain differently," said Dr. White, who has also been involved in research at Duke on alcohol in adolescent rats. "Now there's a sense of urgency. It's the same place we were in when everyone realized what a bad thing it was for pregnant women to drink alcohol."
Take the time to read this. (NY Times registration is free. If you don't want to register, go to www.bugmenot.com.) It's a very sad story.
This article* PROMETA. PROMETA is a protocol for combining certain prescription drugs and nutritional supplements. PROMETA protocols are owned and sold by Hythiam, Inc. Hythiam is in the midst of a major publicity and sales push.
This study suggests that most people who develop alcohol problems resolve them without any professional help. Keep in mind that this is a non-clinical population.
Michael Dukakis is chairing a panel of government officials, treatment providers and recovery advocates. They recently released a report that calls for states to take lead on addiction policy:
...states bear many of the costs of alcohol and other drug addiction, spending an estimated 13 percent of their budgets on addiction-related problems.
However, the report noted, 'Less than four percent of this is spent on prevention and treatment, while more than 96 percent pays for the avoidable social and physical consequences that result from our failure to apply what we know about how to prevent and treat substance-use problems.' These costs include child-welfare, prison, court, police, and Medicaid expenditures for treating medical problems related to addictive illnesses.
The whole report is available here. It's not an exciting read, but it is worth downloading.develop a statewide strategy that includes all agencies affected by drug and alcohol problems increase accountability for all state agencies working on issues related to addiction educate lawmakers about the costs of alcohol and other drug addiction to improve their participation in policymaking train judges to address alcohol and other drug use among defendants and improve coordination with treatment services create a state alcohol and other drug policy advisory board, answerable to the governor and lawmakers, that includes representatives from the recovering community and civic leaders
I'm of the opinion that we focus too much on supply and enforcement, nut here's some good news on those fronts:
The Ann Arbor News ran an Other Voices piece by me. It was really visible - above the fold, a big headline and a big graphic. Hopefully it will motivate some people to take some action.
I wrote something about this a few weeks back. Proposal 36 in California was passed by California voters in 200 and required that the state offer treatment as an alternative to jail or prison for most nonviolent drug offenders.